Worcestershire County Council - `E10000034`ACTIVE

Emissions

URL: http://www.worcestershire.gov.uk/

Time to load: 0.8 seconds

Date checked	CO2 / grams	Rating	Page size	Energy
2025-10-15	0.54	F	3.7MB	GRID?
2025-09-04	0.73	F	5.1MB	GRID?
2025-08-07	0.75	E	3.0MB	GRID?
2025-07-16	0.79	E	3.1MB	GRID?
2025-06-03	0.87	F	3.4MB	GRID?
2025-04-23	0.80	E	3.2MB	GRID?
2025-03-05	0.89	F	3.5MB	GRID?
2025-02-11	1.06	F	4.2MB	GRID?
2025-01-07	1.01	F	4.0MB	GRID?
2024-12-10	1.07	F	4.3MB	GRID?
2024-11-07	1.20	F	4.8MB	GRID?
2024-10-16	1.27	F	5.1MB	GRID?
2024-09-26	0.97	F	3.8MB	GRID?
2024-08-07	0.93	F	3.7MB	GRID?
2024-07-09	0.91	F	3.6MB	GRID?
2024-06-11	0.91	F	3.6MB	GRID?
2024-05-07	0.74	E	2.9MB	GRID?
2024-04-11	0.74	E	2.9MB	GRID?
2024-03-12	0.83	E	3.3MB	GRID?
2024-02-07	0.90	F	3.6MB	GRID?
2024-01-09	1.05	F	4.2MB	GRID?
2023-12-05	0.92	F	3.7MB	GRID?
2023-11-07	1.01	F	4.0MB	GRID?
2023-10-11	1.07	F	4.3MB	GRID?
2023-09-19	1.07	F	4.2MB	GRID?
2023-08-08	0.82	E	3.3MB	GRID?
2023-07-11	0.87	F	3.4MB	GRID?
2023-06-13	1.07	F	4.2MB	GRID?
2023-05-02	1.11	F	4.4MB	GRID?
2023-04-05	1.18	F	4.7MB	GRID?
2023-03-02	1.14	F	4.5MB	GRID?
2023-02-07	0.25	B	1.0MB	GRID?
2023-01-03	0.25	B	987kB	GRID?
2022-12-01	0.25	B	988kB	GRID?
2022-11-01	0.25	B	987kB	GRID?
2022-10-05	0.60	D	987kB	GRID?
2022-08-24	0.83	E	1.4MB	GRID?
2022-07-21	0.71	E	1.2MB	GRID?
2022-06-08	1.35	F	2.2MB	GRID?
2022-05-05	1.27	F	2.1MB	GRID?
2022-04-06	1.49	F	2.5MB	GRID?
2022-03-01	1.43	F	2.4MB	GRID?
2022-02-01	1.35	F	2.2MB	GRID?
2022-01-04	1.38	F	2.3MB	GRID?
2021-12-08	1.29	F	2.1MB	GRID?
2021-11-02	1.53	F	2.5MB	GRID?
2021-10-06	1.42	F	2.4MB	GRID?
2021-08-31	1.42	F	2.4MB	GRID?
2021-07-29	1.42	F	2.4MB	GRID?
2021-06-30	0.92	F	1.5MB	GRID?
2021-05-27	0.90	F	1.5MB	GRID?
2021-03-04	0.90	F		GRID?

Tip: Optimise images

We estimate potential to save at least 241kB* by optimising images:

Arley%20Trees-48.jpg... is 792kB and could be 162kB smaller
pershore_education_r... is 560kB
press_team_web_image... is 273kB
press_team_web_image... is 257kB
jn2526.141_wcc_budge... is 119kB and could be 27kB smaller
CSD%20search%20bar%2... is 79kB and could be 13kB smaller
riverside_flooding_.... is 69kB and could be 8.4kB smaller
worcestershire_winte... is 52kB and could be 14kB smaller
pexels-pixabay-41632... is 38kB and could be 6.9kB smaller
a_couple_on_top_of_t... is 33kB and could be 5.2kB smaller
witch_cauldron.jpg?h... is 32kB and could be 5.2kB smaller

First, check that images are appropriately sized - you most likely don't need a 6000x4000 pixel image straight from a digital camera. In Windows, the Photos software will let you quickly shrink huge images and will give you an improvement.

Next you could try using tinyjpg.com (JPG image) or tinypng.com (PNG image) to further optimise your image. This will strip out metadata that may be taking up lots of space.

*This is an estimate from Google PageSpeed and you may get much better results than this in practice.

Tip: Large files

Aside from images, here are the biggest resources:

sdk.26100.js is 270kB
js?id=G-RSBCTX039R&cx=c>m=4e... is 137kB
js?id=G-9B28X59LD2&cx=c>m=4e... is 130kB
fa-brands-400.woff2 is 119kB
gtm.js?id=GTM-PQBVHQ6 is 113kB

The page uses 1 font which requires 119kB. Could system fonts be used instead?

Tip: Limit third-party code

Here are the largest sources of third-party code:

Google Tag Manager uses 381kB
onconnect.app uses 286kB
Civic uses 98kB
AddToAny uses 31kB
Cloudflare CDN uses 138kB
Other Google APIs/SDKs uses 109kB
Google Fonts uses 58kB

Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading.