Tandridge District Council - `E07000215`ACTIVE

Emissions

Time to load: 0.9 seconds

Date checked	CO2 / grams	Rating	Page size	Energy
2024-11-07	3.63	F	14.4MB	GRID?
2024-10-16	0.68	E	2.7MB	GRID?
2024-09-26	0.67	E	2.7MB	GRID?
2024-08-07	0.40	C	1.6MB	GRID?
2024-07-09	0.58	D	2.3MB	GRID?
2024-06-11	0.58	D	2.3MB	GRID?
2024-05-07	0.52	D	2.1MB	GRID?
2024-04-11	0.49	C	1.9MB	GRID?
2024-03-12	0.52	D	2.1MB	GRID?
2024-02-07	0.44	C	1.7MB	GRID?
2024-01-09	0.39	C	1.5MB	GRID?
2023-12-05	0.43	C	1.7MB	GRID?
2023-11-07	0.44	C	1.8MB	GRID?
2023-10-11	0.49	C	2.0MB	GRID?
2023-09-19	0.50	D	2.0MB	GRID?
2023-08-08	0.40	C	1.6MB	GRID?
2023-07-11	0.41	C	1.6MB	GRID?
2023-06-13	0.66	E	2.6MB	GRID?
2023-05-02	0.63	D	2.5MB	GRID?
2023-04-05	1.01	F	4.0MB	GRID?
2023-03-02	1.20	F	4.8MB	GRID?
2023-02-07	1.13	F	4.5MB	GRID?
2023-01-03	0.95	F	3.8MB	GRID?
2022-12-01	1.02	F	4.1MB	GRID?
2022-11-01	0.97	F	3.9MB	GRID?
2022-10-04	2.27	F	3.8MB	GRID?
2022-08-24	2.43	F	4.0MB	GRID?
2022-07-21	1.91	F	3.2MB	GRID?
2022-06-08	1.89	F	3.1MB	GRID?
2022-05-05	1.06	F	1.8MB	GRID?
2022-04-06	1.11	F	1.8MB	GRID?
2022-03-01	1.24	F	2.1MB	GRID?
2022-02-01	1.46	F	2.4MB	GRID?
2022-01-04	1.33	F	2.2MB	GRID?
2021-12-08	1.35	F	2.2MB	GRID?
2021-11-02	1.09	F	1.8MB	GRID?
2021-10-06	1.23	F	2.0MB	GRID?
2021-08-31	1.44	F	2.4MB	GRID?
2021-07-29	1.26	F	2.1MB	GRID?
2021-06-30	1.15	F	1.9MB	GRID?
2021-05-27	1.39	F	2.3MB	GRID?
2021-03-04	1.11	F		GRID?

Tip: Optimise images

We estimate potential to save at least 5.7MB* by optimising images:

Tan%2082.jpg is 12.3MB and could be 5.4MB smaller
Dormers-720-400-p-C-... is 156kB and could be 48kB smaller
Tandridge-720-400-p-... is 130kB and could be 40kB smaller
iStock-1379349342-72... is 112kB and could be 37kB smaller
Ways-to-Pay.jpg is 71kB and could be 47kB smaller
digital%20transforma... is 67kB and could be 28kB smaller
Job-Hiring.jpg is 60kB and could be 35kB smaller

First, check that images are appropriately sized - you most likely don't need a 6000x4000 pixel image straight from a digital camera. In Windows, the Photos software will let you quickly shrink huge images and will give you an improvement.

Next you could try using tinyjpg.com (JPG image) or tinypng.com (PNG image) to further optimise your image. This will strip out metadata that may be taking up lots of space.

*This is an estimate from Google PageSpeed and you may get much better results than this in practice.

Tip: Large files

Aside from images, here are the biggest resources:

fa-solid-900.woff2 is 320kB
app.css?cdv=361 is 202kB
js?id=G-K5XL8Z78QZ&l=dataLayer... is 132kB
app.bundle.js?cdv=361 is 89kB
fontawesome-webfont.woff2?v=4.... is 78kB

The page uses 2 fonts which require 398kB. Could system fonts be used instead?

Tip: Limit third-party code

Here are the largest sources of third-party code:

Google Tag Manager uses 186kB
Cludo uses 54kB

Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading.