Bedford Borough Council - E06000055ACTIVE

Emissions

• URL: http://www.bedford.gov.uk/

  Time to load: 0.8 seconds

  CO2 estimatePage size

  Note: from 1st November 2022 we adopted version 3 of the methodology for estimating CO2 emissions. This will tend to lower CO2 estimates for a given size.

  Date checked	CO2 / grams	Rating	Page size	Energy
  2025-03-05	0.40	C	1.6MB	GRID?
  2025-02-11	0.37	C	1.5MB	GRID?
  2025-01-07	0.38	C	1.5MB	GRID?
  2024-12-10	0.34	B	1.3MB	GRID?
  2024-11-07	0.38	C	1.5MB	GRID?
  2024-10-16	0.41	C	1.6MB	GRID?
  2024-09-26	0.45	C	1.8MB	GRID?
  2024-08-07	0.41	C	1.6MB	GRID?
  2024-07-09	0.32	B	1.3MB	GRID?
  2024-06-11	0.32	B	1.3MB	GRID?
  2024-05-07	0.32	B	1.3MB	GRID?
  2024-04-11	0.35	C	1.4MB	GRID?
  2024-03-12	0.32	B	1.3MB	GRID?
  2024-02-07	0.29	B	1.2MB	GRID?
  2024-01-09	0.29	B	1.2MB	GRID?
  2023-12-05	0.28	B	1.1MB	GRID?
  2023-11-07	0.32	B	1.3MB	GRID?
  2023-10-11	0.38	C	1.5MB	GRID?
  2023-09-19	0.43	C	1.7MB	GRID?
  2023-08-08	0.39	C	1.6MB	GRID?
  2023-07-11	0.36	C	1.4MB	GRID?
  2023-06-13	0.38	C	1.5MB	GRID?
  2023-05-02	0.42	C	1.7MB	GRID?
  2023-04-05	0.36	C	1.4MB	GRID?
  2023-03-02	0.42	C	1.7MB	GRID?
  2023-02-07	0.37	C	1.5MB	GRID?
  2023-01-03	0.24	B	963kB	GRID?
  2022-12-01	0.28	B	1.1MB	GRID?
  2022-11-01	0.24	B	972kB	GRID?
  2022-10-04	0.67	E	1.1MB	GRID?
  2022-08-24	2.41	F	4.0MB	GRID?
  2022-07-21	2.58	F	4.3MB	GRID?
  2022-06-08	2.26	F	3.8MB	GRID?
  2022-05-05	2.79	F	4.6MB	GRID?
  2022-04-06	1.78	F	3.0MB	GRID?
  2022-03-01	1.61	F	2.7MB	GRID?
  2022-02-01	1.68	F	2.8MB	GRID?
  2022-01-04	1.45	F	2.4MB	GRID?
  2021-12-08	1.67	F	2.8MB	GRID?
  2021-11-02	1.42	F	2.4MB	GRID?
  2021-10-06	1.40	F	2.3MB	GRID?
  2021-08-31	1.54	F	2.6MB	GRID?
  2021-07-29	1.54	F	2.5MB	GRID?
  2021-06-30	1.73	F	2.9MB	GRID?
  2021-05-26	1.90	F	3.1MB	GRID?
  2021-03-04	1.39	F		GRID?

  Tip: Optimise images

  We estimate potential to save at least 74kB* by optimising images:

  1. thumbnail_Mayor%20To... is 207kB
  2. wintery%20homepage%2... is 153kB
  3. council-landscape-co... is 123kB and could be 74kB smaller

  First, check that images are appropriately sized - you most likely don't need a 6000x4000 pixel image straight from a digital camera. In Windows, the Photos software will let you quickly shrink huge images and will give you an improvement.

  Next you could try using tinyjpg.com (JPG image) or tinypng.com (PNG image) to further optimise your image. This will strip out metadata that may be taking up lots of space.

  *This is an estimate from Google PageSpeed and you may get much better results than this in practice.

  Tip: Large files

  Aside from images, here are the biggest resources:

  1. fa-brands-400.woff2 is 110kB
  2. cc.js?renew=false&referer=www.... is 100kB
  3. gtm.js?id=GTM-KL4LV9V is 92kB
  4. 135.4755a93fc5065f342da8.js is 89kB
  5. 14681.js is 80kB
  6. 3.4755a93fc5065f342da8.js is 76kB
  7. css_YvMB48zFPMGLiorijcG26Z4fvI... is 67kB

  The page uses 1 font which requires 110kB. Could system fonts be used instead?

  Tip: Limit third-party code

  Here are the largest sources of third-party code:

  1. Cookiebot uses 137kB
  2. Browsealoud uses 292kB
  3. govdelivery.com uses 203kB
  4. FontAwesome CDN uses 134kB
  5. Google Tag Manager uses 92kB
  6. Google Fonts uses 49kB

  Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading.

  

External data links

• Find that Postcode
• ONS Linked Data
• Boundary (GeoJSON)